Wii MotionPlus opened the door at one new era for Wii, a return ticket in the baptismal funds. The promise of a faithful recognition, that of the 1:1, opened the way with the most insane hopes, energy of a Star Wars where never the combat would not have been also realistic with possible plays of sport more immersifs, where each knack like would have effleuré your misadventure. But it would be almost contemptible to omit one of the new franknesses freshest from the support, that which would almost make us pass the pill not to have Professor Layton: Zack & Wiki. Yes, our pirate with the enigmas sometimes as tortured as a novel of Amélie Nothomb, with in Bonux gift the mouth angelica of the hero of Capcom in cover.

Flashback: January 2008, unloading on our greedy coasts of the play. A few times later, an eulogistic test on our site (and a little everywhere). Alchemy had functioned, the unanimous critic, the purchasers less. Too bad. But doesn't one say that “to become adult is not to age, but to have a reflexion?”

Now, when one knows at which point Wiimote was worn advisedly in this title, how not to be drawing utopian as for a possible continuation left Wii MotionPlus? The more so as the firm recently admitted to want to put even ahead the franknesses born during this generation of consoles, little imports the actual sales of them. And there one enjoys to imagine some mechanics of play based on the right execution of the movement, consequently having a broader panel because more precise. To open umbrellas, to turn of the keys, to inspect the decoration, in short a whole interaction which would be perhaps seen sublimated by Wii MotionPlus.

You will have seized it: Zack & Wiki 2 could be announced well soon that would hardly astonish us with the final one; that would confirm simply the will of some artists to work for the satisfaction of one (large) handle in love one with the simple, effective concepts but so much satisfying for the pensive glouton.

As Cocteau said: “The future does not belong to anybody. There are no precursors, it exists only latecomers.”

Let us specify that the text does not have any will to give birth to from false hopes, it must be regarded only as one editorial pleasure.