„The national socialism is based on the true Christianity “
Adolf Hitler praised in its speeches again and again „protects “- contrary to the traditional - Christianity. What was its intention? Of Selwyn Duke.
In the year 1934 he said during a speech in Koblenz: „I know that here and there the objection was stated: ” You left the Christianity. “No, we did not leave the Christianity. Those before us came, the Christianity left. The national socialism does not oppose the church is anti-religious still. On the contrary, he is based on the true Christianity. “
During a speech on 12 April 1922 he said: „My feeling as a Christian refers me to my gentleman and redeemer as a fighter “.
In citizens of Berlin a speech in the year 1933 it presented as a defender of the faith and said themselves:
„We were convinced of that the people needs and requires this faith. We took up for it the fight against the atheistische movement and not only with some theoretical explanations: We eliminated it. “
There are many per-Christian or anti-Christian Hitler quotations - few of them are falsified. They are used in the sharp debate between Christians and Atheisten over Hitler's world view.
How can we reconcile Hitler's contradictory statements? The columnist Joe crowd key answered this question in the daily paper `to New York Times':
According to data of Baldur of Schirach, the leader of the LV youth organization - admits later than Hitler Youth - „the destruction of the Christianity was a from the outset express goal of the LV movement “. But first „considerations made it the advisableness not possibly “this radical attitude officially into the act to convert, as long as the national socialism had not consolidated its power.
One followed thereby the healthy human understanding. Because Hitler was not much, but with security an awkward politician.
He knew that he had to establish a front for the Christian people and the church first, until he held power in hands. That is probably the reason, why practically all were strongly spread its per-Christian statements - before he had put his iron fist around the German neck.
On the other hand it spread its anti-Christian poison in the private area - seems like it with much passion - then also after its seizure of power, when it was allowed to show its dark soul unpunished.
The political advantages of currying favor with the Christian masses are easy to understand. Because Hitler would have provoked their resistance during his ascent, would have left him its luck.
Which political goal did it serve, faith to attack later? Which other reasons could have had Hitler say such things - if he would not have really believed her?
Does this behavior surprise someone? Politicians are like water, which take the form of the container, in which them are.
The author is an US-American author and columnist, who admit also by its lectures are.
Next time: Hitler talked frequently with the eagerness of a bishop
© picture: German federal archives, CC
The article is part of the following row:
3. „the national socialism is based on the true Christianity “
Monday, 5 October 2009 21:31
Monastery pupil: @ Thomasius
Owing to back.
I do not feel openly confessed competently enough, around me over the FR. Civil war a judgement to form, and does not have to acquire also the time me authority. It is interesting that Falange Franco had difficulties with the church in the decades after its victory increasingly.
The question, to what extent politics in a concrete case have religious background, is also a subjective problem of the observer. I slope rather to be considered the political business so areligiös as games of chess. The reason actually lies not in the policy, but in it that successful power people would obstruct themselves by religious chains.
If one (which I do not do) wants to call the fight against everyday opponents of a religion `Religionskrieg', the Spanish civil war was also a Religionskrieg, like also the fall of the Schah regime.
I do not feel openly confessed competently enough, around me over the FR. Civil war a judgement to form, and does not have to acquire also the time me authority. It is interesting that Falange Franco had difficulties with the church in the decades after its victory increasingly.
The question, to what extent politics in a concrete case have religious background, is also a subjective problem of the observer. I slope rather to be considered the political business so areligiös as games of chess. The reason actually lies not in the policy, but in it that successful power people would obstruct themselves by religious chains.
If one (which I do not do) wants to call the fight against everyday opponents of a religion `Religionskrieg', the Spanish civil war was also a Religionskrieg, like also the fall of the Schah regime.
Monday, 5 October 2009 15:40
Paulaner: jaja, with kreuznet one understands much completely differently; -)
more gregorianer: @katho
now I understand the brutal proceed the talmudisten in Palestine.
„“- Prefix is ambiguous.
now I understand the brutal proceed the talmudisten in Palestine.
„“- Prefix is ambiguous.
Monday, 5 October 2009 15:31
more gregorianer: @katho
very interesting, thank you. I did not know yet at all, jesus in koran messias ist.ich am orthodox and
now I understand the brutal proceed the talmudisten in Palestine. I was seen seen photos by alive burning children by phosphorus and baby with close shot in the head yesterday was on „euros news “the changed over temple mountain. to go the gläubigen imprisoned and niedergeknüppelt if it to try purely. completely clearly: there the supporters of the anti-Christian want the temple back-conquer .seit 1000 years to live Christians, Jews and Muslims (children abraham) together and now come this sect and want everything to expropriate. unesco the cultural heritage is to describe, even those now Geneva convention wants these criminals to now manipulate, thus their commits a crime in the future no more to be pursued ability those is even ready the 3rd world war for ignite-igniting those did not talmudisten is nevertheless proudly on it jesus to have killed for these robbers. in you tube one can remain each time anschauen.wo damn it all the Christians the temple mountain is nevertheless our everything heiligtum, the house of God and we must demonstrate around the temple mountain to release. I appeal to all Christians together to do around the Belagerer to drive out. who gläubig to call itself wants has also obligations. we have one are correct to speak and a hand write.
the temple is not a private real estate.
now I understand the brutal proceed the talmudisten in Palestine. I was seen seen photos by alive burning children by phosphorus and baby with close shot in the head yesterday was on „euros news “the changed over temple mountain. to go the gläubigen imprisoned and niedergeknüppelt if it to try purely. completely clearly: there the supporters of the anti-Christian want the temple back-conquer .seit 1000 years to live Christians, Jews and Muslims (children abraham) together and now come this sect and want everything to expropriate. unesco the cultural heritage is to describe, even those now Geneva convention wants these criminals to now manipulate, thus their commits a crime in the future no more to be pursued ability those is even ready the 3rd world war for ignite-igniting those did not talmudisten is nevertheless proudly on it jesus to have killed for these robbers. in you tube one can remain each time anschauen.wo damn it all the Christians the temple mountain is nevertheless our everything heiligtum, the house of God and we must demonstrate around the temple mountain to release. I appeal to all Christians together to do around the Belagerer to drive out. who gläubig to call itself wants has also obligations. we have one are correct to speak and a hand write.
the temple is not a private real estate.
Monday, 5 October 2009 14:05
Thomasius: @katho
When were you last with the physician?
Monday, 5 October 2009 13:55
katho: define
The Atichrist is not to be looked for reliably in the national socialism. The true Christianity was pursued from the outset by the Jews. Why? Jesus is come to the temple into Jerusalem around the sects of the Jews Pharisäer etc. - that are to be exposed Talmudisten through the word of God and the temple cleaned. When they recognized the fact that the Messiah threatens their power began it with the Verfogung. By lies and propaganda they instigated the people. They tried to expropriate the Messiah for itself and established the cross, the eternal indication of their malice, in order to degrade it and to spread fear among its supporters. They wanted to let the people believe that Jesus is a cheat and they would have power and only from them the Messiah would come. The anti-Christian is so already long m NT descriptive and until today in the sect of the Talmudisten established. This sect wants to present now again back on the temple mountain around its own Messiah. This is exactly the head Antichristen.Die of prayers of the sect and statements of the Talmud about Jesus in the articles with Kreuz.net was already described. Today we see the supporters of the anti-Christian in Jerusalem. They have the temple already encircle and closed off.
I am catholic and in the Koran read that Jesus, Sohn of the virgin Maria is definitiiv the Messiah. Thus the Koran re-established the universal truth. The sect of the Talmudisten hides itself in Palestine and thus with the Semiten.
I am catholic and in the Koran read that Jesus, Sohn of the virgin Maria is definitiiv the Messiah. Thus the Koran re-established the universal truth. The sect of the Talmudisten hides itself in Palestine and thus with the Semiten.
Sunday, 4 October 2009 21:05
Thomasius: @Klosterschüler@vonHerzmanovsky
Thanks! I quote from a stories work:
In the condition of 1931 - made separation from state and church, which a laizistische character of the new government and the Antklerikalismus of prominent politicians caused that the office church became a Gegnerin of the republic and a storage tank of the reaction, even if the low Klerus did not regard at the beginning of proclaiming the republic by any means without sympathies. (Alleged) the defense of the rights of the church became in the years after 1931 also one of the most important crystallization points in the anti-republican fight of the conservative forces; the further discussion „of the religious question “led in the future to the development of the CEDA, whose right wing was strongly anti-republican. According to opinion many contemporary observer and later historian the religion question became the most important problem… of the republic; the civil war was designated later often than Religionskrieg, whereby it became to however often survey that the Antiklerokalismus itself not against the church as a religious community, but when turned social allied ones of the traditionally dominant ones.
In the condition of 1931 - made separation from state and church, which a laizistische character of the new government and the Antklerikalismus of prominent politicians caused that the office church became a Gegnerin of the republic and a storage tank of the reaction, even if the low Klerus did not regard at the beginning of proclaiming the republic by any means without sympathies. (Alleged) the defense of the rights of the church became in the years after 1931 also one of the most important crystallization points in the anti-republican fight of the conservative forces; the further discussion „of the religious question “led in the future to the development of the CEDA, whose right wing was strongly anti-republican. According to opinion many contemporary observer and later historian the religion question became the most important problem… of the republic; the civil war was designated later often than Religionskrieg, whereby it became to however often survey that the Antiklerokalismus itself not against the church as a religious community, but when turned social allied ones of the traditionally dominant ones.
Sunday, 4 October 2009 15:08
Monastery pupil: Faith wars
If the Spanish civil war were a faith war, then probably Adolfs attack against bolschewistische Russia. Finally the Ukrainer in `befreiten' the areas was allowed to then live again their religion publicly. Enough of the absurdities, which will hang-write simply here.
Still which to the Irish-English conflict, which was only apparently more religious: The British tried to put the Irish Republican Army as Protestant hostile, in order to win beside the Irish Protestants also in Great Britain support for the harsh approach. In its publications the denomination was indicated by spies or collaborators, that were killed by the Irish Republican Army, whenever the victim were Protestant. With catholic victims (which the majority was), the denomination not noted, so that the impression would develop, the Irish Republican Army kill only Protestants
Still which to the Irish-English conflict, which was only apparently more religious: The British tried to put the Irish Republican Army as Protestant hostile, in order to win beside the Irish Protestants also in Great Britain support for the harsh approach. In its publications the denomination was indicated by spies or collaborators, that were killed by the Irish Republican Army, whenever the victim were Protestant. With catholic victims (which the majority was), the denomination not noted, so that the impression would develop, the Irish Republican Army kill only Protestants
Sunday, 4 October 2009 14:53
VonHerzmanovsky Orlando: @Thomasius
For example the Spanish civil war plotted of general Franco and its supporters.
Clearly a faith war was, into the Spanish people the gläubigen communists davorn held still more innocent one to murder.
Clearly a faith war was, into the Spanish people the gläubigen communists davorn held still more innocent one to murder.
Sunday, 4 October 2009 14:36
Thomasius: more @Klosterschüler
To the Aufbesserung of your historical knowledge. Migratory workers are not a modern problem. Also „the west migration “is not new. During the phase of the industrialization walked from the east into the Ruhr district. Or one walked out over Hamburg or Bremen to the United States. Polish seasonal workers - harvest helpers - are also no new feature.
The European Union pursued the policy from the outset that the jobs at the best should be settled in the proximity of the residences of the employees. That means in plain language: Reduction „of the immigrant workers at that time “and export of the simpler jobs - which the trade unions deplore. The term wage pusher is a quite unchristian designation. Put times into the position from you in such a way titulierten yourselves!
To improve the Bildungsanstrenungen here one overslept the logical consequence however „“.
To the wars of the last century:
For example the Spanish civil war plotted of general Franco and its supporters. Or the Pinochetregime in Chile, some want the dictator because of its Mordtaten holy to speak.
Other example: Ireland
The Grand Famine - the famine - was taken by the British „with large interest “to the knowledge. Were only catholics. The war of liberation in the First World War was naturally also religiously motivated. The civil war of the Irish Republican Army in Northern Ireland - also religiously motivated.
The European Union pursued the policy from the outset that the jobs at the best should be settled in the proximity of the residences of the employees. That means in plain language: Reduction „of the immigrant workers at that time “and export of the simpler jobs - which the trade unions deplore. The term wage pusher is a quite unchristian designation. Put times into the position from you in such a way titulierten yourselves!
To improve the Bildungsanstrenungen here one overslept the logical consequence however „“.
To the wars of the last century:
For example the Spanish civil war plotted of general Franco and its supporters. Or the Pinochetregime in Chile, some want the dictator because of its Mordtaten holy to speak.
Other example: Ireland
The Grand Famine - the famine - was taken by the British „with large interest “to the knowledge. Were only catholics. The war of liberation in the First World War was naturally also religiously motivated. The civil war of the Irish Republican Army in Northern Ireland - also religiously motivated.
Sunday, 4 October 2009 13:40
Monastery pupil: Legasthenie & Geschichtsklitterung
@ Thomasius
It concerns not an assistance pact, but armament (= `its military abilities gradually too verbessern').
Financial adjustment - for whom? For the corrupt elite in the east countries and the net yields of the west companies. The Normalos (those nothing by the European Union not gotten) is there more badly than to socialist times. Or why otherwise thousands Hungary in German slaughterhouses should work as wage pushers. Ask they nevertheless times a Polish domestic help, why them work today in Germany black. (e.g. because their man, wg. the Ukrainian wage pushers in Poland no sufficient income more has.) The people to migratory workers to degradieren and thus the family co-operation destroy, is super+Christian.
@ Paulaner
Do you polish nevertheless times our Geschichtkenntnisse up, when has it since the old Fritz in Europe `religiously angezettelte' wars given? And when there was according to your opinion last such war.
(You write so vaguely from `religiously plotted wars. Mean do you with it wars out motives, like the 30-jährigen, also religösen, the Reconquista, or simple wars with Militärseelsorge?) One may be strained.
It concerns not an assistance pact, but armament (= `its military abilities gradually too verbessern').
Financial adjustment - for whom? For the corrupt elite in the east countries and the net yields of the west companies. The Normalos (those nothing by the European Union not gotten) is there more badly than to socialist times. Or why otherwise thousands Hungary in German slaughterhouses should work as wage pushers. Ask they nevertheless times a Polish domestic help, why them work today in Germany black. (e.g. because their man, wg. the Ukrainian wage pushers in Poland no sufficient income more has.) The people to migratory workers to degradieren and thus the family co-operation destroy, is super+Christian.
@ Paulaner
Do you polish nevertheless times our Geschichtkenntnisse up, when has it since the old Fritz in Europe `religiously angezettelte' wars given? And when there was according to your opinion last such war.
(You write so vaguely from `religiously plotted wars. Mean do you with it wars out motives, like the 30-jährigen, also religösen, the Reconquista, or simple wars with Militärseelsorge?) One may be strained.
Sunday, 4 October 2009 12:55
Paulaner: Unfortunately, Brandenburgis, lacks it me your brilliance, e.g. To disguise Pinochet in irony.
Brandenburgis: Unfortunately, Paulaner,…
If your admiration would not be meant ironical, then would have you as a principal Deppen to regard. But sooo…
If your admiration would not be meant ironical, then would have you as a principal Deppen to regard. But sooo…
Sunday, 4 October 2009 12:30
Brandenburgis: Unfortunately, Paulaner,
the Dummhiet never becomes extinct, as one notices all too clearly at you. 
Sunday, 4 October 2009 12:15
Paulaner: Most wars of Europe were religiously plotted civil wars.
Thomasius: more @Klosterschüler
The European Union is however no state.
The European Union is there to avoid these idiotischen civil wars in the future. I fear however that will not succeed for different reasons.
The European Union should become a loose union state also interest rush equal, before it comes to the war. Disputatious ones, rachsüchtige, fundamental and national oriented idiots, how they flicker in kreuznet again and again also here, become extinct hopefully soon.
The European Union is however no state.
The European Union is there to avoid these idiotischen civil wars in the future. I fear however that will not succeed for different reasons.
The European Union should become a loose union state also interest rush equal, before it comes to the war. Disputatious ones, rachsüchtige, fundamental and national oriented idiots, how they flicker in kreuznet again and again also here, become extinct hopefully soon.
Sunday, 4 October 2009 12:04
Thomasius: more @Klosterschüler
Oh ever!! Each state has the natural task to protect its citizens from the outside against martial attacks and take precautions for such cases. The European Union is however no state. Therefore solidary behavior must be written into the contracts. At a state that is not necessary.
The European Union strives on like the Federal Republic by the way also - the living conditions of the inhabitants each other to adapt. In Germany there is in addition the financial adjustment of the countries, in the European Union comparable measures. That means that the regions, in which humans is relatively more badly it are promoted. The means in addition are applied by the regions, in which humans is relatively better. So is now times. Over it one should not excite oneself - in particular as a Christian - particularly.
The European Union strives on like the Federal Republic by the way also - the living conditions of the inhabitants each other to adapt. In Germany there is in addition the financial adjustment of the countries, in the European Union comparable measures. That means that the regions, in which humans is relatively more badly it are promoted. The means in addition are applied by the regions, in which humans is relatively better. So is now times. Over it one should not excite oneself - in particular as a Christian - particularly.
Sunday, 4 October 2009 11:34
Monastery pupil: @ Thomasius
Surely, those European Union countries have the wars among themselves abgeschworen, but not the wars outward. This aggressive basic attitude is also remarkably in the European Constitution fixed:
„The member states commit themselves to improve their military abilities gradually “(art. 27, 3
How many conditions know you, where the militarism has condition rank? And whether you call that now a constitution treaty, as it happens since the failure of the first Ireland vote, are all the same. Naturally these peace missions had not been decided by the UN. Or do they, the Chinese believe the bombardment of their message in Belgrade would have agreed at that time?
Armament is only one aspect of the European Union-Gaudi. At present it goes pressing the life standards of the populations of majority particularly by opening of the intra-European & non-European borders.
What has now with catholic to be to do? Disturb me, the uncritical, affirmative positioning of the Klerus to this `marvelous Friedenswerk'.
„The member states commit themselves to improve their military abilities gradually “(art. 27, 3
How many conditions know you, where the militarism has condition rank? And whether you call that now a constitution treaty, as it happens since the failure of the first Ireland vote, are all the same. Naturally these peace missions had not been decided by the UN. Or do they, the Chinese believe the bombardment of their message in Belgrade would have agreed at that time?
Armament is only one aspect of the European Union-Gaudi. At present it goes pressing the life standards of the populations of majority particularly by opening of the intra-European & non-European borders.
What has now with catholic to be to do? Disturb me, the uncritical, affirmative positioning of the Klerus to this `marvelous Friedenswerk'.
Sunday, 4 October 2009 10:11
Thomasius: more @Klosterschüler
Since we find us here with the catholics, who to call and Jesus Christ the peace preached itself to Christians, it is already interesting that within Christian Europe wars were practically constantly led against each other - also independently of the movement of the Protestantism. (100-jähriger war, Spain, having castle, France.) Also the wars in the world of European powers against each other led 7-jähriger war, Great Britain, France, the Netherlands/Spain. There it already is of some importance that the European countries abgeschworen themselves against each other contractually effectively connected and the war „“have.
The employment of the German Federal Armed Forces outside of the European Union, addressed by you, took place, if I remember myself quite each time due to a resolution of the UN. It goes less separating thereby around the foreign exchange „Germans ton the front “- as well known an employment against the freedom efforts at that time of the Chinese in relation to European interventions, because the Germans wanted to absolutely act after the establishment of realm 1871 as „world power “and therefore later also two world wars plotted - around solidary behavior around excesses to avoid = „peace pin end measures “.
The employment of the German Federal Armed Forces outside of the European Union, addressed by you, took place, if I remember myself quite each time due to a resolution of the UN. It goes less separating thereby around the foreign exchange „Germans ton the front “- as well known an employment against the freedom efforts at that time of the Chinese in relation to European interventions, because the Germans wanted to absolutely act after the establishment of realm 1871 as „world power “and therefore later also two world wars plotted - around solidary behavior around excesses to avoid = „peace pin end measures “.
Saturday, 3 October 2009 20:45
Monastery pupil: @ Thomasius
What do you mean?
The fact that the European Union agreement will probably prevent intra-European wars will provoke but wars with other world powers. By the way lasts the European peace already since 1945 not because of the European Union, but owing to `the equilibrium Schreckens'.
Since the dissolution of the Eastern Bloc the German resistance became already again more active: In the wars of secession in Yugoslavia, in Afghanistan, Somalia. World-wide the Germans ton the front goes to the penetration more European/German interests, ähm no - naturally out of humanitarian reasons.
The fact that the European Union agreement will probably prevent intra-European wars will provoke but wars with other world powers. By the way lasts the European peace already since 1945 not because of the European Union, but owing to `the equilibrium Schreckens'.
Since the dissolution of the Eastern Bloc the German resistance became already again more active: In the wars of secession in Yugoslavia, in Afghanistan, Somalia. World-wide the Germans ton the front goes to the penetration more European/German interests, ähm no - naturally out of humanitarian reasons.
Saturday, 3 October 2009 16:06
Thomasius: @Brandenburgis
Tja. With me it is even past!
Saturday, 3 October 2009 15:58
Brandenburgis: That are you itself probably
, there do you remember were lifelong nevertheless quite stupid??
Saturday, 3 October 2009 15:56
Thomasius: @Brandenburgis
They probably meant: the prosperity of the western world was then reduced first by the Kolonialisierung of the world and exploitation of their wealth „created “, due to the WKII „the wealth “of colonial powers. The wealth of Germany after WKI held itself also within limits and not by the democracy but by the allied ones was kept low, which had taken themselves of Germany behavior after the war 1871 to the model.
I mean to remember me that Germany was no democracy at that time.
I mean to remember me that Germany was no democracy at that time.
Saturday, 3 October 2009 14:35
Brandenburgis: From where am I to know?
I assume it however. Liberal democracy is possible only in prosperity times. As soon as it kriselt, it breaks down regularly and dictators take over the force. Hat's now already hundredfold, thousandfold given. And there the prosperity of the western world by the criminal democrats is totally runiert and we only by debt excesses over water holds themselves, thinks I times that soon force regime is installed.
Saturday, 3 October 2009 14:07
chico flojo: @Brandenburgis
[…]that they the restoration of the Ancién regime consider impossible…
it probably to be understood in the sense is that already a new general Franco stands in the starting hole?
it probably to be understood in the sense is that already a new general Franco stands in the starting hole?
Saturday, 3 October 2009 14:01
Brandenburgis: That has however very much
to do thereby that they consider the restoration of the Ancién regime impossible.
Saturday, 3 October 2009 14:00
chico flojo: @Brandenburgis
[…]although all experts advised against.
Oh - and who were these experts? And you probably mean the Federal state Brandenburg - as part of the Federal Republic of Germany… That has to do however nothing with your dreams.
Oh - and who were these experts? And you probably mean the Federal state Brandenburg - as part of the Federal Republic of Germany… That has to do however nothing with your dreams.
Saturday, 3 October 2009 14:00
Brandenburgis: 1933 were now
everything else as „smallcross-hatched “.
Saturday, 3 October 2009 13:56
Thomasius: @chico flojo
About „old times “dreams nevertheless most Foristen of kreuz.net. „The local history and geography “is nevertheless many more important and cling-lasting than „the large world “. Already madame de Staél found the Germans as plentifully smallcross-hatched.
Saturday, 3 October 2009 13:55
Brandenburgis: THERE I can quote only Schiler
„Everything repeats itself only in the life. “The democracy seemed 1933 FF. in Deustchalnd also irrevocably settles, and it came back nevertheless, although all experts advised against. Thus wait for wir's stop. A country Brandenburg gabs also not and it is etc. again there pp.
Saturday, 3 October 2009 13:45
chico flojo: @Brandenburgis
Do you dream actually gladly about „old times “? I'm sorry for it - however those are irrevocable passé.
Saturday, 3 October 2009 13:40
Brandenburgis: No, no, there you err
These two legal objects are perhaps not visible, but give do it already them. But you are right naturally after the present legal situation also partly. The duchy Pommern is 1815 „gone down “, i.e. as it into „the province Pommern “was already converted. This Vewaltungakt had nevertheless the light of the right for itself.
With Böhmen it looks however somewhat differently. A legally clear „completion of “this kingdom did not give it. To that extent regard I the Prätendenten of the house Habsburges or another house still as legal head of the Kingdom of Böhmen, „the states “thereafter came are clearly injustice things, which cannot speak a permanent legal claim.
If it succeeded to the Obehuapt of the family having castle to actually take actual power in Böhmen then it would be also legally perfectly king of Böhmen.
With Böhmen it looks however somewhat differently. A legally clear „completion of “this kingdom did not give it. To that extent regard I the Prätendenten of the house Habsburges or another house still as legal head of the Kingdom of Böhmen, „the states “thereafter came are clearly injustice things, which cannot speak a permanent legal claim.
If it succeeded to the Obehuapt of the family having castle to actually take actual power in Böhmen then it would be also legally perfectly king of Böhmen.
Saturday, 3 October 2009 13:30
chico flojo: @Brandenburgis
There is neither „a duchy to “Pommern still another „Kingdom of “Böhmen. That was times…
Saturday, 3 October 2009 13:27
Brandenburgis: Why is it
no more do not give? Was straight recently there!
Saturday, 3 October 2009 13:26
chico flojo: @Brandenburgis
Those does not give it however any longer.
Saturday, 3 October 2009 13:23
Brandenburgis: No, I mean
the US plans in duchy Pommern and in the Kingdom of Böhmen.
The editorship does not take responsibility for contents of the contributions. She reserves herself the right to delete contributions as well as to exclude readers from the debate.
Media:
